Benchmarking explained, for travel and expense teams

How to benchmark travel spend: what to compare, and with whom

Benchmarking in corporate travel is the process of comparing your travel programme's performance metrics with those of other organisations, to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. It only helps when the comparison is like for like. This guide covers why it is worth doing, what makes it hard and where the comparison data comes from.

Why benchmark a corporate travel programme?

Benchmarking shows whether your programme's costs and booking habits are normal for what you buy, so decisions on suppliers and policy rest on a comparison rather than on your own history alone.
icon

Metrics Comparison

Specific corporate travel KPIs such as spend per trip, compliance rates, average ticket prices or traveller satisfaction scores are compared with those of businesses that are most like yours.
icon

Identifying Best Practices

By understanding what similar companies are achieving, you can identify best practices and strategies that could be applied to your own travel programme
icon

Performance Evaluation

Benchmarking allows you to evaluate your travel programme's performance against a meaningful standard, rather than in isolation
icon

Goal Setting

Insights gained from benchmarking can inform the setting of realistic and competitive goals for your travel programme
icon

Strategic Planning

It helps in strategic planning by providing a clear picture of where your company stands in the market and where there is potential for cost savings or policy enhancements.

What are the challenges in conducting benchmarking?

Benchmarking in corporate travel is clearly useful, but anyone wishing to build this capability needs to work through several challenges:

icon

Data Consistency and Quality:

One of the primary challenges is ensuring that the data used for benchmarking is consistent and of high quality. Different organisations may categorise expenses differently, use various booking tools, or have different policy exceptions, which can make direct comparisons difficult.
icon

Access to Comparable Data:

Finding accurate and relevant data from similar organisations can be challenging. Companies are often reluctant to share detailed travel data, and even when they do, ensuring that it is directly comparable to your own data requires careful alignment.
icon

Changing Industry Standard:

In travel, pricing, supplier offerings and technology change often. These changes can quickly make benchmark data outdated, requiring continuous updates to maintain relevance.
icon

Complexity of Travel Programmes:

Each organisation's travel programme is unique, with its own set of policies, preferred suppliers, and negotiated rates. This complexity can make it hard to find an 'apples-to-apples' comparison for benchmarking purposes
icon

Integration of Different Data Sources:

Consolidating data from bookings, card payments and expense systems into a single base for T&E reporting and analysis can be technically challenging.

Where does travel benchmark data come from?

imageimage

Travel benchmark data comes from 3 kinds of source: published market reports on hotel and air prices, studies run by a travel agency or consultancy across the companies it serves, and pools in which companies share summarised booking data with each other. A market report tells you what a city or a route costs in general. A study or a pool can tell you what other companies actually paid, which is the comparison a supplier conversation needs.

"Similar companies" can mean 2 different things. It can mean companies like yours, of the same size or in the same sector. Or it can mean companies buying the same thing: the same hotel chain in the same city and month, or the same airline on the same route and in the same cabin. For rates, the second is the stricter test, because a price only means something beside what others paid for the same purchase, in the same place, at the same time.

That stricter test is the one Vantage by PredictX applies to corporate travel benchmarking against your peers: hotel rates compared by chain and metro, airfares by airline, route and cabin, with at least 3 companies behind every peer figure.

FAQs

Common questions about benchmarking a corporate travel programme

What is benchmarking in corporate travel?

Benchmarking in corporate travel is the process of comparing your travel programme's performance metrics with those of other organisations, to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. The usual metrics are what you pay, such as average nightly hotel rates and average ticket prices, and how your travellers book, such as how far ahead and through which channel.

Why is benchmarking important for corporate travel programmes?

Benchmarking is crucial as it helps you understand how your travel programme stacks up against the competition, identifies best practices, and informs strategic decisions to enhance your programme's efficiency and effectiveness.

Why do 2 benchmarks of the same programme give different results?

Because they compare different things. One benchmark may use an average, which a single large buyer can pull up or down; another may use the median, the typical rate paid. One may compare a hotel stay with the same chain in the same city and month; another with any hotel in the city across the year. Before acting on a gap, ask what was compared, over what period and how many companies stand behind each figure.

What can you do with a benchmark result?

Take it to the supplier. A rate above what other companies paid for the same hotel chain in the same city, or the same airline on the same route and cabin, is the starting point for a negotiation. A booking habit that differs from other companies, such as booking later, can explain part of the gap, and that part is yours to change.

Compare your own hotel and air rates with peers